I currently live in a very gun-unfriendly state, and I'm in the fantasy stage of picking a carry gun for when I get to move out. I vacillate between a light .357 magnum revolver (simpler mechanism + no mag springs to fatigue = better reliability), and a baby Glock in 10mm, maybe with a NY trigger for lawyer-proofing. I do like 45s, but I crave bigger muzzle-energy numbers in a carry gun.
I got to shoot a heavy Ruger .357mag and a Glock 32C (.357 Sig) today. I believe the revolver was a GP-100 (4-inch stainless), and it weighed a little more than my Kimber, which would put it in the low 40-oz range. The recoil wasn't bad at all, but I'm afraid if I cut the weight in half it might start to hurt.
To bring this back on target (if you'll pardon the pun), however, the highest-power and smallest Glock I could get my hands on was a a .357 sig, compensated. Now I know why people say never to use a ported gun for defense! The cloud of flame billowing out of the top of that slab was astounding! It would be truly blinding in the dark, and forget it if you need to fire the gun close to your body (ouch). To anyone who's shot this in ported and non-ported forms, I ask you, what's the difference in percieved recoil? I know it was relatively easy to bring back on target -- I ripped out 10 shots in about 4 or 5 seconds, just to see if I could keep it all on the paper, and I WAY overcompensated, stringing my shots towards the floor! Is it much harder to bring back on target if it's not ported? How about the hand-slapping? It did have a sharp little kick, but 40 rounds through it was not enough to keep me from putting another 75 rounds through the Kimber afterwards. Is it any worse with a non-ported gun?
Finally, can anyone tell me how the felt recoil compares between full-power .357sig and 10mm loads? As I said, the .357sig was sharper than I'm used to -- if 10mm is twice as harsh, for example, it might be too much for me!
I was actually surprised that full-house .357 mag in a 42-ish ounce revolver, .45 ball in a 38oz Kimber, and .357 sig in a 21oz Glock all felt more or less on par with each other. The 45 was probably the easiest, although 230gr ball put some torque in my hand after shooting 125gr .357sig SWC and 158gr .357mag JSP! I never really noticed it before, but after shooting those light-weights, it was amazing.
I got to shoot a heavy Ruger .357mag and a Glock 32C (.357 Sig) today. I believe the revolver was a GP-100 (4-inch stainless), and it weighed a little more than my Kimber, which would put it in the low 40-oz range. The recoil wasn't bad at all, but I'm afraid if I cut the weight in half it might start to hurt.
To bring this back on target (if you'll pardon the pun), however, the highest-power and smallest Glock I could get my hands on was a a .357 sig, compensated. Now I know why people say never to use a ported gun for defense! The cloud of flame billowing out of the top of that slab was astounding! It would be truly blinding in the dark, and forget it if you need to fire the gun close to your body (ouch). To anyone who's shot this in ported and non-ported forms, I ask you, what's the difference in percieved recoil? I know it was relatively easy to bring back on target -- I ripped out 10 shots in about 4 or 5 seconds, just to see if I could keep it all on the paper, and I WAY overcompensated, stringing my shots towards the floor! Is it much harder to bring back on target if it's not ported? How about the hand-slapping? It did have a sharp little kick, but 40 rounds through it was not enough to keep me from putting another 75 rounds through the Kimber afterwards. Is it any worse with a non-ported gun?
Finally, can anyone tell me how the felt recoil compares between full-power .357sig and 10mm loads? As I said, the .357sig was sharper than I'm used to -- if 10mm is twice as harsh, for example, it might be too much for me!
I was actually surprised that full-house .357 mag in a 42-ish ounce revolver, .45 ball in a 38oz Kimber, and .357 sig in a 21oz Glock all felt more or less on par with each other. The 45 was probably the easiest, although 230gr ball put some torque in my hand after shooting 125gr .357sig SWC and 158gr .357mag JSP! I never really noticed it before, but after shooting those light-weights, it was amazing.